A Little History on a Faulty “Scholarly” Notion: Deutero Isaiah

The faulty notion that the book of Isaiah had multiple authors over centuries (rather than a single author ~700 BC) was first shoveled into Biblical thought by Abraham Ibn Ezra in 1145 AD. Before that, everyone (including numerous people in the New Testament, such as Jesus, John, and Paul) attributed the book to a single author named Isaiah, the son of Amoz, who lived under the Assyrian exile of the northern kingdom of Israel.

Isaiah correctly prophesied that King Cyrus would free Hebrews in a later [Babylonian] exile and the 1st Temple, which was standing during Isaiah’s time, would be rebuilt under Cyrus. The Babylonian exile of the Hebrews started ~605 BC under Nebuchadnezzar. who also destroyed the 1st Jewish Temple in 586 BC.

In 539 BC, the Babylonian kingdom was replaced by the Medo-Persian kingdom. Soon afterward, King Cyrus permitted the Jews to return to their land to rebuild their Temple, which the Jews completed in 516 BC.

Abraham Ibn Ezra couldn’t come to grips with Isaiah’s prophetic words (and their divine implications) so he mused that books 40-66 of Isaiah, which contained the prophecies, were written much later – during the Babylonian exile of the 6th century BC.

Around the 19th century, German scholars succumbed to the same presuppositions of Abraham Ibn Ezra, realizing the divine implications of fulfilled Biblical prophecies. So they frantically assembled tall tales to refute those prophecies by claiming they were written at the same times the prophecies were fulfilled rather than much earlier by other authors than those to whom the books were originally attributed. See other examples from their musings on Moses’ books and the book of Daniel. In the name of high scholarship, academics dug up Abraham Ibn Ezra’s soiled diapers and presented Deutero Isaiah as “scholarship.” Today, their ideas are all the rage, so scholars trying to publish works in refutation are up against an atheistic brick wall.

We’ll be combing through this tangled web of bad ideas in coming weeks. If you’d like to join us, let drop me a reply. I’m looking for experts and have found a few already, thankfully.

SJ Thomason is a business professor who teaches students about leading and managing people in a U.S. university. She’s also a Christian who’s interested in sharing the Good News and Truth of Jesus Christ with others. Visit her on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/ChristianApologist/about

4 Replies to “A Little History on a Faulty “Scholarly” Notion: Deutero Isaiah”

  1. Thank you for this series of commentaries on Biblical prophecies. As you stated, their fulfillment proves the Bible’s validity, which confounds the liberal revisionists who want to “explain” everything through natural means, giving no credence to the supernatural. The passages in Isaiah and Daniel that you reference are particularly egregious to the revisionists. So encouraging to see your treatment of this development. I’m enjoying your thoughtful work.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I love the term “liberal revisionist.” lol. Yes: they’re very uncomfortable with the obvious prophecies in both Daniel and Isaiah. I found a good quote from the Dead Sea Scrolls on Daniel (4QFlorilegium): “which is written in the book of Daniel the prophet.” Given that some of the DSS have been dated to 125 BC, the Maccabean hypothesis is soundly refuted.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: